*digs up the old blog*
Man it has been a while. I normally blog over on Facebook now (http://www.facebook.com/360Encouragement)
However, I found it advantageous to upload my document here. I hope you like it.
----------------------------------
-->
Greetings:
What I wanted to do with this particular snippet is discuss
the inerrancy of Scripture. I have
a previous commentary on the matter over in main blog, Weekend Encouragement, Unit 11 (Because Accursedness is
No Fun) conclusion. However, I
wanted to take that commentary a little bit deeper. First, let’s begin with the fact that the Bible if God’s
Word without error and just analyze this right here for a moment.
Introduction
Remember that the Bible is a book about morality, and a book
about history, heritage, and identity.
It is, first and foremost, a game-planning book for God’s Comprehensive
Will from the beginning to the end of time. Analyzing it from this perspective, it can be better seen
why certain things were necessary so that God the Father can be all in
all. Next, let’s discuss how God
operates. God swore upon Himself
to the people because there is nothing greater than Him in the universe. So His Standard is the greatest
Standard. And thus, God only
honors what He does (what is in line with His Moral [the Standard He set in
Scripture] and Comprehensive Will).
The key to this point is that there
are no other authorities that demonstrate or describe how God operates
other than the Bible. Therefore, first off, the remaining
essential doctrines of the Christian faith all come from Scripture (which came
from God Himself). And furthermore, if we want to know the gold standard, we
must read and understand Scripture. To this end, we should check our “self-help” books. If it’s not in a Biblical context, it’s
not helping us all that much. As
far as reflecting that Standard, well I’ll get into that later.
Attacks on Scripture
As with the remaining doctrines of the Christian faith,
Scripture comes under attack. I
would argue that the primary reason that Scripture is attacked is because there
was never a historical report of a book falling from the sky or something to
that effect. Well, I consider that
silly for the reason I mentioned earlier: The Bible is a book about history,
so let’s kill that argument (not shared by too many), and go to the
others. Let’s break what I feel
are the top three arguments down.
Argument 1: The Bible
Isn’t Relevant Today
The Bible was physically written by around A.D. 400, 500 or
so. So I guess at first glance you
could say the Bible is dated. But
let me break down and break apart this argument. First, from a practical perspective. Let’s look at some of the concepts of
the Bible. First off, Adam and Eve
ate of the fruit, having been told they would surely die. They committed the first sin, and they
and everyone since them has died.
Lazarus was raised (but died again) and Jesus was raised (because He’s
the Messiah). Everyone who can
read this is going to die someday.
Of course, this is unless, Jesus comes back beforehand. But otherwise, everyone else is dying. Second, the Sodom and Gomorrah
argument. Those towns were so
egregiously immoral God used a divine move to wipe them out. Roman Empire? Well, they were so mired in sexual immorality it was
ridiculous. There were places the
affluent in Rome could just roll up in somewhere and just have sex with some
folks. And there’d be no problems
with it. And the slaves? Marched for hundreds of miles from
their native lands to Rome butt naked.
Come on man, really? And
their leader considered himself divinity.
Their own sin (lust/pride/envy....yep, those) caused their
downfall. And today....people’s
lusts, pride, and envy are causing them to go down left and right. Are some people “getting away with
it”? Well sure. But that human power is bound to fail
them.
What’s my point?
What
has been will be again, what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun. (Ecc 1:9)
The
wages of sin is death (Romans 6:23).
While this pertains to spiritual death of separation from God, 1
Corinthians 11:27-32 puts more of a duality on it, in that watching ourselves
we avoid spiritual and physical death.
Conclusion:
It happened then, it’s happening now, and it’ll keep happening until Jesus
comes back.
Argument
2: The Bible is chauvinist and women had no rights
If you take a look at the old
testament, a few things stand out.
One person brought up to me that female slaves were held in a lower
context than male slaves. Slavery
was to pay off debts in the Old Testament. And today?
Well, they can put you in jail over not having paid your bills so what
has changed? And once those debts were paid, folks had the choice of sticking
around or moving on. And another
brought up to me that if a woman was raped she had to marry her assailant-the
Deuteronomy passage. Time to
debunk this myth. First off, the
law never binds a woman to marry her rapist. In these times, a woman was under the authority of her
father or patriarchal familial figure until that person turns over authority to
the husband (even now men traditionally ask for the dad’s blessing before
marriage), and what loving dad is going to turn his girl (because women married
younger during this time) to some raper man? Exactly. He
paid a fine. (Ref: Deut 22:28-29,
Exodus 22:17). And if they
married, the man had to take care of his wife and was disallowed to divorce her
for any reason (Deut 24:1-4, Matt 5:32, 19:9). And if a man raped a woman promised to another man,
well...off with his head (Deut 22:22-27).
Even today, laws are incredibly biased toward women. And they should be to an extent. A rapist need to be prosecuted, fined,
everything really. But I mean
women who falsely yell “Rape!” are often just let go to roll on down the
lane. Again, what else is
new?
Let’s go to the other side of this
argument and the other elephant in the room.
Wives,
submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as
unto the Lord. (Ephesians 5:22).
I bold the last part because men
often abuse this verse, and women often shut down when they hear it and want to
choke us out. But is because of
generational sin and a general deviance from God’s Model for life that men
demand by-default submission and women resist this to their last breath. But a lot of folks don’t even
understand that first off, the woman only submit to a man in the way she
submits to God. If the man isn’t
godly, the woman should not submit to the ungodly principles that man may be displaying (each responsible for their own salvation, Philippians 2:12).
She should encourage and enlighten him in her nurturing nature, but nobody is allowed to follow
something that isn’t of God (Matthew 6:24). We also forget these verses like it.
Submitting
yourselves one to another in the fear of God. (Ephesians 5:21)-God wants
peace in every relationship.
Should you be “right”, or should you be moving toward harmony? Trust me, the harmony takes care of the
“right”-ness. Which is why God put
it here like this. Because God
wants to be our gold standard, we do the submission for Him, and then He sends
the Power to deliver that person over to us. It’s the Biblical context of “attracting more bees with honey than vinegar”.
Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ
also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify
and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word That
he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle,
or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love
their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. For no
man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the
Lord the church: (Ephesians
5:25-29)
First off, I want you to notice
that God gave way more instruction to the man here than he did the woman. That’s a tall task; for a man to have
to be like Christ in this specific way to be a functional husband. But thus, that is the submission
standard. And while this is
instruction to a man, it’s also like a cheat sheet to a woman. If your man does this, it’s alright to
submit to him, in order to gain greater harmony with God as two becoming one flesh.
A lot of people would try to
discredit Paul as in his epistles he often writes about the man being the head
of the woman, and that women should not have authority over a man. Well, it’s not like Paul came up with
that idea from thin air. In the
church of Corinth the gender roles had become distorted. The women were dominating the men and
the men were acting sheepish.
Those passages were not to demean women, but rather to invigorate the
men, to get back to their “as Christ loved the church” roles as spiritual
leaders. Not to mention that is
says no authority, not no teaching (although a man should be going to a man who
has been where he currently is on how to be a man, but I digress). I could go into a whole commentary on
Biblical gender definitions, but I’ll save that for another time. And I will just say these two points.
Women were made to help men do what
God gave them (Genesis 2). For a
woman to even know what this is, she has to have her own separate purpose
independent of the man, so that the two come together in one hybrid purpose
within God’s Order (1 Corinthians 11:3). This is why God gave both the man and the woman dominion (Genesis 1:28). Women were also created to uplift other
women, and be powerful and productive in their own right. Ragab was a prostitute but still
understood who God was and why those scouts were there. She stood up for God’s Standard and her
people were protected. Mary is
probably the most important woman of all time. Jesus was born through her starting with the Immaculate
Conception. And last but not
least, when Jesus had risen and the men had scattered, Jesus used the women to go tighten the men up.
Conclusion:
The Bible protects women. It
protects everyone, as God doesn’t play favorites. The Word is designed to produce powerful and productive
people, male and female, playing their role. And there’s nothing like a godly woman to get and KEEP
a man on his toes.
P.S. For those of you who only see women being powerful in
the context of helping men, you tell me when God ever did something without
someone first submitting to Him and what He was doing, male OR female? Everything gets done in the context of
relationships, so get relationships fortified and glorifying God.
Argument 3: Men wrote
the Bible
In a sense, this argument is right. Men took to the papyrus or what
have you and wrote the words.
However, they got the instructions from on High. Also, for one say that a man could
distort the words of the Supreme Being of the universe, multiverse (basically
if it exists, God has authority over it), gives man far too much credit.
We all know the 2 Timothy 3:16-17 argument about Scripture
being sacred for teaching, reproof, and etc. right? Well, there’s another verse like it that more directly
touches on my point.
16 For we did not follow cleverly devised stories when
we told you about the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ in power, but we were
eyewitnesses of his majesty. 17 He received honor and glory from God the
Father when the voice came to him from the Majestic Glory, saying, “This is my
Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. We
ourselves heard this voice that came from heaven when we were with him on the
sacred mountain.
19 We also have the prophetic message as something
completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light
shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your
hearts. 20 Above all, you must understand that no
prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things.
21 For prophecy never had its origin
in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were
carried along by the Holy Spirit. (2 Peter
1:16-21)
That is the divine inspiration
argument. But it could be (and has
been) argued that this was indeed cleverly devised and placed in
Scripture. But let’s put this in
perspective. To say that these
things are not true give one of 3 arguments, all of which I will debunk or
prove asinine to even bring up.
That (1) God does not have the authority He speaks of, (2) God is not
real at all, or (3) God cannot be defined because a book didn’t fall from the
sky..
Let’s tackle (1). I'd like to think I already have. Everything written in Scripture, the
types of phenomena that occur, both positive and sinful, have happened, keep
happening and will happen.
Something has to be causing all of that right? Well, it’s someone.
The Father in Heaven in His Comprehensive Will is sending this world to
a place of destruction, but has provided a way out through His Son Jesus
Christ. If you don’t know about
Him, you should go see Him. Soon.
And (2). God isn’t real. I don’t think anyone in this camp
should be reading this. But in
case you are, why must a being that in your mind and according to your
worldview does not exist to you be discredited and debunked? Simple.
3 For
the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to
suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers
to say what their itching ears want to hear. 4 They will turn their ears
away from the truth and turn aside to myths. (2 Timothy 4:3-4)
Yep. Calling
you out. Why else would you want
to disprove a being who embodies Orderly Love? A being who seeks to protect and empower against things that
hurt us? One with every bit of
knowledge there is to know. And
every bit of power and authority there is to have. One that if you have Him, you can’t lose? Because your
standard of love, prosperity, and victory are different from His most
likely. Open your mind, and come
see about His Son.
With the way the world is, if God’s not real...grab an M-80
and start the revolution. Because humanity
surely isn’t going to fix the crap in this world. Open your mind.
And before you call me a Bible thumper, everybody has sin (Romans
3:23). The difference
between those in the world and those in Christ is that we have a gold standard
by which we can recognize and overcome our iniquity. And we desire it through motive, word, and
deed.
And (3) God cannot be
defined. Well, the Bible
defines Him. How can you have a
God at all who is not defined? One
who is dynamic and can change (looking at some of those other faiths). Who would want a supreme being who had
opinions and not facts? That’s
just no good. But how can you have
boundaries without a definition?
How can you have order without boundaries? Must we all just fly by the seat of our pants and just do
whatever’s clever? Yeah, that’s
worked so well for humanity leading up to now. I personally would prefer not to
have a God-free world inundated with chaos.
Conclusion: God is God, and has dominion over
all. Your argument is invalid.
I just want to wrap this up by saying this. Knowing the Bible never got anyone into
Heaven by itself. There is no
substitution for the saving grace of Jesus Christ (John 3:16), and the sealing
of His Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13-14).
And once you get the “Yay I’m not going to Hell!” part out of the way,
then you can move on to gaining a deeper knowledge of God through both the
reading of Scripture and direct contact with him through prayer and
supplication (Philippians 4:6-7).
And pray in the context of the Lord’s Prayer, in that we submit to what
God wants for our world as opposed to a whole bunch of things we want. Remember, God only honors what He does,
but His comprehensive Honor upon our lives will make you wonder why you wanted
ANYthing else.
That’s my spin in on it. Thanks for reading!